[WikiEN-l] Improper speedy taggings

• Previous message: [WikiEN-l] Undeletion policy and VFU still out of step--advice sought
• Next message: [WikiEN-l] Re: Criteria for deletion (was: Afd "votes" with no real reasons given)
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 9/16/05, Sam Korn <smoddy at gmail.com> wrote:
> You will excuse me, but Tony's comments lead me to believe strongly
> that he is talking about victory over deletionists rather than victory
> over bad content.

How does a "deletionist" lose if the bad content or lack of content is
replaced or supplemented with good content?

Nominating something for deletion should be motivated by a desire to
improve the encyclopedia, not focused on whether any one specific
action is taken.

>From what I've seen, Tony's comments in AfD debates have referenced
winning over delete voters, not winning "against deletionists".

Again, assume good faith; "win-win" is the goal.  This isn't a zero sum game.  
-- 
Michael Turley
User:Unfocused

• Previous message: [WikiEN-l] Undeletion policy and VFU still out of step--advice sought
• Next message: [WikiEN-l] Re: Criteria for deletion (was: Afd "votes" with no real reasons given)
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]