[WikiEN-l] Why changing the deletion process is a bad idea

• Previous message: [WikiEN-l] Why changing the deletion process is a bad idea
• Next message: [WikiEN-l] Why changing the deletion process is a bad idea
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> Oh please no. Name anything that could harm wikipedia that doean't get
> delt with as a speedy or a copyvio.

Deleting encyclopedic articles harms the encyclopedia.  Just because a
"consensus" of professional deletionists decide that some article or
another isn't "notable" doesn't make it unencyclopedic.  See
Snowspinner's post that started this iteration of this discussion.

Kelly

• Previous message: [WikiEN-l] Why changing the deletion process is a bad idea
• Next message: [WikiEN-l] Why changing the deletion process is a bad idea
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]