[WikiEN-l] Quality tags

Wed Sep 7 18:06:02 UTC 2005

On 07/09/05, charles matthews <charles.r.matthews at ntlworld.com> wrote:

> Trying to think laterally for the moment.  If articles were rated on a scale
> of 1 to 100 for excellence, the lower rungs of the ladder would correspond
> to poor articles, of various types: stubby, badly written, failing when
> judged by policy (NPOV, NOR, CYS), non-encyclopedic.  This could be the
> basis of an automated clean-up/deletion mechanism also, but would need
> perhaps one other ingredient (to make a kind of 2-d plot).  What should that
> be?

Quality of form vs. quality of content?

The one is ranging from an unwikified orphan stub to a polished,
linked, well-referenced 5,000 word article article; the other deals
with comprehensiveness, NPOV, accuracy, &c.

-- 
- Andrew Gray
  andrew.gray at dunelm.org.uk