[WikiEN-l] Silverback, indefinite block in order?

Mon Oct 17 14:21:38 UTC 2005

You need to back off on the indefinite blocks a bit. The ArbCom can  
ban for a maximum of a year. You have had good luck so far (and might  
succeed with Silverback) but simply relying on the fact that someone  
is so disliked that no other administrator will unblock them is very  
shaky ground. I think you are on the verge of putting yourself into  
avoidable trouble.

Fred

On Oct 16, 2005, at 7:52 PM, Mattwolf Binder wrote:

> I am not involved, and 172 supporting my RfB has nothing to do with  
> it. In fact if you check the arbcom pages you'll see I opposed 172.  
> But after seeing all this crap he puts up with I think that I'll  
> end up supporting. Silverback has been attacking 172, trolling,  
> being a level 19 revert warrior, and is all around raising the  
> stress for everyone involved. In fact he'll probably end up in  
> front of the arbcom, and I'm tempted to indefinitely block just to  
> save them work. He's turning into another Tern, a user who I block  
> for a short period of time, whines on the mailing list, doesn't  
> seem to let up anything, and will probably end up blocked  
> indefinitely. I'm also really tired of the political hatred and  
> right wing POV pushing by Silverback. Would anyone object to  
> indefinitely blocking him?
>
> --Redwolf24
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> WikiEN-l mailing list
> WikiEN-l at Wikipedia.org
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
> http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
>