[WikiEN-l] Britannica proud to lag years behind recent developments such ...

Sun Mar 27 15:25:46 UTC 2005

Yes, we are way ahead of Britannica in many areas, but, to be realistic,  
just as we have many excellent articles that they simply don't have, they also  
have many articles that we don't. Of course, we are in a better situation,  
because we can easily fill in the gaps. 

I therefore encourage people to take a look at [[Wikipedia:2004  Encyclopedia 
topics]]. Make redirects if we have the articles, and see what  articles they 
have that you can fill in. Start with a sub, or even a substub. It  is bound 
to grow. Let's make sure we have everything they have and more. 

Danny