[WikiEN-l] Abusive editors

Fri Mar 11 00:40:25 UTC 2005

I believe it's capped already to 1,000 words and 100 diffs, which
sounds a lot, but when you have a complex case, you can use them up
pretty fast. I got through my 1000 words in no time in the LaRouche
case, and I don't think I was being long-winded. It means I've got a
ton of unused evidence still left on my computer for next time. ;-)

Sarah

On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 16:36:41 -0800 (PST), Daniel Mayer
<maveric149 at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Noted. I think this is a side effect of the ArbCom not capping the amount of
> evidence that can be presented (several evidence pages have exceeded 100KB).
> I'd like to cap the number of words each person in arbitration can submit.