[WikiEN-l] ArbCom - too attached to 'equal treatment'?

• Previous message: [WikiEN-l] ArbCom - too attached to 'equal treatment'?
• Next message: [WikiEN-l] ArbCom - too attached to 'equal treatment'?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> Are you saying the idea should not have even been *considered*?

This thread has given me the idea that there are at least a few
Wikipedians who feel that they have the Divine Right of Long-Standing
Editors, and as such are permanently beyond reproach in all things.
That the ArbComm might dare to question their actions is not merely an
insult -- it is cause to disband the ArbComm and permanently hard ban
the individual traitors who did not kowtow to their exalted status.

-- 
 Sean Barrett     | Caesar si viveret, ad remum dareis.
 sean at epoptic.com | 

• Previous message: [WikiEN-l] ArbCom - too attached to 'equal treatment'?
• Next message: [WikiEN-l] ArbCom - too attached to 'equal treatment'?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]