Are you saying the idea should not have even been
*considered*?
This thread has given me the idea that there are at least a few
Wikipedians who feel that they have the Divine Right of Long-Standing
Editors, and as such are permanently beyond reproach in all things.
That the ArbComm might dare to question their actions is not merely an
insult -- it is cause to disband the ArbComm and permanently hard ban
the individual traitors who did not kowtow to their exalted status.
--
Sean Barrett | Caesar si viveret, ad remum dareis.
sean(a)epoptic.com |