[WikiEN-l] ArbCom - too attached to 'equal treatment'?

• Previous message: [WikiEN-l] ArbCom - too attached to 'equal treatment'?
• Next message: [WikiEN-l] ArbCom - too attached to 'equal treatment'?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

AndyL wrote:

> I have stated once already that someone I know who was working on a
> complaint against Herschelkrustofsky had second thoughts upon seeing
> tempbans implemented (or pondered) in other cases against complainants
> (specifically my complaint against ArmchairVexillologistDon in which the
> ArbComm was initially considering tempbanning *both of us* from all articles
> related to Canada until the arbitration was concluded - this was being
> proposed before any evidence had even been heard


Temporary injunctions are for the specific purpose of keeping the peace.
I'll also note that this one did not in fact pass, or even close. Are you
saying the idea should not have even been *considered*?


- d.

• Previous message: [WikiEN-l] ArbCom - too attached to 'equal treatment'?
• Next message: [WikiEN-l] ArbCom - too attached to 'equal treatment'?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]