[WikiEN-l] ArbCom - too attached to 'equal treatment'?

• Previous message: [WikiEN-l] ArbCom - too attached to 'equal treatment'?
• Next message: [WikiEN-l] ArbCom - too attached to 'equal treatment'?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

AndyL said:
>
> I have stated once already that someone I know who was working on a
> complaint against Herschelkrustofsky had second thoughts upon seeing
> tempbans implemented (or pondered) in other cases against complainants
> (specifically my complaint against ArmchairVexillologistDon in which
> the ArbComm was initially considering tempbanning *both of us* from all
> articles related to Canada until the arbitration was concluded - this
> was being proposed before any evidence had even been heard

Why is this a problem?  For a tempban to stick, the arbitrators all have
to agree to it.  If you don't trust them to make a fair decision in such a
case, you certainly can't trust them to arbitrate.

• Previous message: [WikiEN-l] ArbCom - too attached to 'equal treatment'?
• Next message: [WikiEN-l] ArbCom - too attached to 'equal treatment'?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]