[WikiEN-l] ArbCom - too attached to 'equal treatment'?

Mon Mar 7 19:26:58 UTC 2005

>From: David Gerard <dgerard at gmail.com>
>
>JAY JG wrote:
>>From: David Gerard <dgerard at gmail.com>
>>>JAY JG wrote:
>
>>>>and when it came to the inevitable RfAR months later (after which the 
>>>>person in question was banned for over a year), none of the evidence 
>>>>presented in the RfC was even considered.
>
>>>Er, why not? It would likely have been an excellent start
>>>to arbitration evidence. Which case do you mean?
>
>>As far as I know none of the evidence in my RfC re: Alberuni was used in 
>>the actual findings against him.
>
>
>Ah, okay. Apology on my part for not going looking, that was one of the
>earliest cases I looked at.
>
>Note to all bringing RFArs: if you've done an RFC, list it on the
>Evidence page *and* explicitly reuse the evidence!

Just to be clear, I was not a complainant in the RfAR against Alberuni.  I 
explicitly avoided that case for a number of reasons, including ones 
mentioned earlier on this list.

Jay.