From: David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com>
JAY JG wrote:
and when it came to the inevitable RfAR months
later (after which the
person in question was banned for over a year), none of the evidence
presented in the RfC was even considered.
Er, why not? It would likely have been an excellent start
to arbitration evidence. Which case do you mean?
As far as I know none of the evidence in my RfC re: Alberuni was used in the
actual findings against him.
Jay.