[WikiEN-l] Rules, expertise, and encyclopedic standards

Sun Mar 6 11:54:01 UTC 2005

The problem here is that 172, a confirmed revert warrior, got put on revert
parole and was unable to conform to its requirements. He needed to be able
to revert frequently in order to maintain the ideological bias he advocates.
Trapped, he is lashing out.

Fred

> From: geni <geniice at gmail.com>
> Reply-To: geni <geniice at gmail.com>, English Wikipedia <wikien-l at Wikipedia.org>
> Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2005 03:29:18 +0000
> To: English Wikipedia <wikien-l at wikipedia.org>
> Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Rules, expertise, and encyclopedic standards
> 
>> but when a
>> policy related to process is broken, it will attract a huge contingent of
>> users fussing over who reverted whom, how many reverts there were, and what
>> did or did not constitute a revert. The rules are shaping a culture on
>> Wikipedia utterly obsessed with process, but incognizant of product.
> 
> Go on name names. When it comes to keeping an eye on the 3RR section
> of the admins notice board I would be impressed if you come up with
> more than three. That is hardly a huge crowd.
> 
> -- 
> geni
> _______________________________________________
> WikiEN-l mailing list
> WikiEN-l at Wikipedia.org
> http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l