[WikiEN-l] Blocked for 'vandalism' on a friggin April Fools article

Fri Apr 1 13:41:27 UTC 2005

Daniel Mayer wrote:
> 
> Because that is not an article under any definition we have. It is *not*
> encyclopedic content and was moved to the Wikipediaspace for the time being. It
> was moved just like any other bad jokes or other deleted nonsense are. We are
> an encyclopedia. 

Just as an article content dispute cannot be called vandalism, neither 
can an article placement dispute.