[WikiEN-l] RE: Wik's vandalism and threats

Thu May 27 22:39:35 UTC 2004

He is banned for 1 week after his last attempt to log on. So long as he
keeps tying to log in his week has not started. In my opinion...

Fred

> From: "Dan Drake" <dd at dandrake.com>
> Reply-To: dd at dandrake.com, English Wikipedia <wikien-l at Wikipedia.org>
> Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 17:56:41 +0000 (UTC)
> To: wikien-l at wikipedia.org
> Subject: [WikiEN-l] RE: Wik's vandalism and threats
> 
> On Thu, 27 May 2004 13:59:43 UTC, "KNOTT, T"
> <tknott at qcl.org.uk> wrote:
> 
>> He's been banned for a week, let's enforce that ban.
> 
> Does this mean that at the end of the week, he comes back unbanned?  I
> find that completely incredible, if true(*).  How many times must we
> appeal to the Supreme Court to get a user banned permanently when he
> immediately violates a ban that the AC spent vast amounts of deliberation
> on?  Just how meaningless *is* and arbitration decision?  We seem to be
> exploring the limits.
> 
> 
> (*) Say it ain't so.
> 
> 
> -- 
> Dan Drake
> dd at dandrake.com
> http://www.dandrake.com
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> WikiEN-l mailing list
> WikiEN-l at Wikipedia.org
> http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l