That is nonsense. As I have replied in the correct
thread:
1. I did not call for your removal
2. The reason I criticised you was that you were (you agreed) condescending
towards others.
Then you should not take my comment to Fred as a reaction to you. You
haven't, but others have explicitly called from my removal.
I feel that your concern of not wanting to get
involved in every name-calling
dispute is a valid one, and should be discussed. I asked you numerous times
to give reasons for holding the views you do, but you declined to give them.
Then I made a mistake. I took the ... um ... urgency of your request
for discussion to be more accusatory than it appears I should have. I
am willing to discuss the issue with anyone prepared to consider the
possibility that my position has valid aspects to it; I am not willing
to defend my position against charges that I seek to destroy civiliz-
... I mean, Wikipedia as we know it.
Give me a moment to prepare a cogent statement, and the discussion can begin.
--
Sean Barrett | Ah-ha! They take me for the
sean(a)epoptic.com | fool I am! --Groo the Wanderer