"arbitration(a)nerstrand.net" I guess that is the 'secret' email list, eh? (secret as in "archives are not world-readable") That is nonsense. As I have replied in the correct thread: 1. I did not call for your removal 2. The reason I criticised you was that you were (you agreed) condescending towards others. I feel that your concern of not wanting to get involved in every name-calling dispute is a valid one, and should be discussed. I asked you numerous times to give reasons for holding the views you do, but you declined to give them. Your calling my criticisms against you an enforcement of "thoughtcrime" is rather ridiculous given the fact that I *want* to discuss the issue and you quite evidently don't. Best, Sascha Noyes Anyway, On Sunday 25 January 2004 12:01 pm, Fred Bauder wrote: > We need to get information of this sort before the genaral audience of > users so that they have an informed opinion when they vote on arbitrators. > > Fred > > > From: Sean Barrett <sean(a)epoptic.org> > > Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 08:42:13 -0800 > > To: arbitration(a)nerstrand.net > > Subject: Re: Decisions, Opinions, Precedents and Learning from Experience > > > >> I suggest that on any matter each arbitrator first state a conclusion > >> such as accept or don't accept then a brief (or lengthy as it suits > >> them) explanation of why. > > > > > > -- > > Sean Barrett | Madness takes its toll. Please have exact change. > > sean(a)epoptic.com | > > _______________________________________________ > WikiEN-l mailing list > WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org > http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l -- Please encrypt all email. Public key available from www.pantropy.net/snoyes.asc