[WikiEN-l] Easter Bradford

KNOTT, T TKNOTT at qcl.org.uk
Thu Jan 15 14:07:50 UTC 2004


I don't know anything about the law, but surely if there were libellous
remarks on the page, (and I'm not saying there are) it would only be
necessary to remove those bits. I think I am right in saying to be libel
it has to be untrue? Perhaps we should respond by asking him to state
which bits of the article are untrue?

As for it being a vanity page, we should deal with that later, after we
decide what to do about the libel accusation.

Theresa





More information about the WikiEN-l mailing list