[WikiEN-l] William Connelley no longer neutral contributor (Re: toJimbo)

Tue Nov 25 10:02:38 UTC 2003

"Tim the Enchanter" <t-money at thehouse.ws> writes:

> I would say the answer to that is no.  You could go to a library and look up
> GW and you would find numerous books on either side of the argument.  

Or you could look in scientific journalists.  You will find a great many
scholarly papers supporting GW, and comparitively very few that do not.
They may be wrong, but they're not really sharply divided.

Don't judge cutting edge science by what appears in the popular press.
If you want to know what scientists are thinking, look in journals.
-- 
Gareth Owen
"The best lack all conviction and the worst are full of passionate intensity"
                  --  W. B. Yeats forsees the standard of debate on wikipedia-l