[WikiEN-l] Out of line harassment from EntmootsOfTrolls

Thu Aug 21 19:03:44 UTC 2003

Sigh. I didn't want to have to come here again, but now I
have no choice. For months, EntmootsOfTrolls has been
harassing me and writing hateful comments on my personal
User page.  In the past week this person has gone off the
deep end. 

No matter what articles I write on (Marvel comics, Supreme
Power, Norman Corwin, Cathechism, Scientific
Classification, Zionism, Biology, Israel) he keeps on
ranting about me, Zionism and racism.  He does this on my
own User page every few hours, which he keeps trying to
turn into a one-man campaign to ban me.  After weeks of his
abuse, I can be silent about this no longer.

Consider the following: EntmootsOftrolls denies that he can
be anti-Semitic, while simultaneously baiting me about the
book of Leviticus.

http://www.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=Talk:Zionism_and_racism&diff=1281977&oldid=1281892
"Also, I cannot be anti-Semitic, since, if I was, I would
have to say that *any* attention paid to Jews is unhealthy.
I am not sure you are a Jew anyway, RK. How much of
Leviticus do you follow? ;-) [[User:EntmootsOfTrolls|EofT]]

If that isn't classical Jew-baiting, no such thing exists.

Further, if I recall correctly, we had already agreed that
when sometimes starts talking about the "Zionization of
Wikipedia" or the "Zionpedia" then they are being
anti-Semitic.  So consider this:

"I offer User talk:EntmootsOfTrolls/on applying Sharia to
RK as an alternative to the Zionization of Wikipedia. Take
it as you will. EofT 17:12, 21 Aug 2003"

Not only is this anti-Semitic, but certain extremist
interpretations of Sharia (Islamic law) allows for Jews to
put to death for insults to Muslims.  EntmootsOfTrools
knows that I am aware of this facet of Sharia. So not only
is this Jew-baiting, but EntmootsOfTrolls is using a veiled
reference to something terrible as his idea of a joke. This
is another reason why I believe that this man may be
obsessed with me, in an unhealthy way.

Either we agree that this kind of thing is prohibited and
we ban this person, or we agree that it is permitted. If
the latter, I will regretfully have to leave Wikipedia, as
I cannot cooperate in good conscience with people if they
approve of such writings.  I would never countenance saying
the equivalent things to Muslims, Christians or atheists,
and it is equally wrong here.

With deep concerns,

Robert ("RK")

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com