[Wikide-l] Re: use of ESA-images in Wikipedia
Daniel Arnold
arnomane at gmx.de
Sa Okt 30 10:35:18 UTC 2004
Hallo,
Hier mein zweiter Brief an die ESA, diesmal auf Englisch. Bitte konstruktive
Kritik, bevor ich ihn abschicke. Englisch ist schließlich nicht meine
Mutersprache. ;-)
Grüße,
Daniel Arnold (Arnomane)
----
Dear Mrs. Imbert-Vier,
First of all thank you for your answer.
> Further to your request, we only authorise you to use the ESA views to
> illustrate your articles concerning the ESA's missions in your encyclopedia
> Wikipedia for educationnal purposes.
> Of course, for each ESA's view used, the complete copyright has be
> mentioned (ESA+illustrator name).
>
> We do not authorise you to offer to your clients the possibility to
> download, copy, modify the ESA's files and to use them for other purposes.
At first I have a technical quesition to your conditions: How can we meet your
demand not offer the possibility of downloading the images, because for using
them at Wikipedia they have to be displayed in a browser and thatfor
downloaded from Wikipedia-servers.
Here is also an example link how an image is provided in Wikipedia by
WikiMedia-Software ( it is a special page which can be embedded in
text-pages):
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bild:Smart1.jpg
Despite that these usage conditions are exactly causing the problem I had
described in my german mail, because they are contrary to the principles of
Wikipedia.
Wikipedia is a free encyclopedia, meaning that it content has to be free
according the definitions of the GNU Free Documentation license
( http://www.gnu.org/licenses/licenses.html#FDL ). Note: Free doesn't mean at
no cost, but free in the sense of freedom.
The main principles of this license are:
1) Credit to the orgininal authors has to be given
2) Freedom of usage: Everyone can use the work for every purpose.
3) Freedom of modification: Everyone is allowed to modify the work according
to his/her own needs.
4) Freedom of distribution: Everyone is allowed to distribute the work
(original and modified) at the price he/she likes, provided that every
interested person gets a transparent (open data format) machine readable copy
of the work and that for modifications/derivative work the same rights are
given to everyone.
Note: Personal rights (of persons shown in images) and trademark rights are
untouched by this license.
Many ESA-images were uploaded by several people at Wikipedia in the false
assumption, that your conditions are compatible to the GNU-FDL, which is
clearly not the case.
So we have unluckily only two options:
a) deleting all ESA images in Wikipedia, although Wikipedias goal is education
and the Foundation of Wikipedia is a non profit organisation, simply because
of the far reaching rights we give to everyone (and of course we deliberately
don't want to restrict them).
b) the images can be released by ESA at conditions compatible to the GNU-FDL.
Of course b) is only a wish not a demand. You are the copyright owner. You can
do whatever you want with your content.
If we have to choose a) many peeople using and enhancing Wikipedia would be
very disappointed, because the articles (as the ones I was pointing out in my
previous mail) would suffer a dramatic loose of astethetical and
informational quality - and of course there would be a loose of balance in the
content presented by Wikipedia, since the NASA allows the use of it images
within the public domain.
If you didn't already get in contact with this project: Wikipedia is a large
community driven project (founded by an Open Source enthusiast called Jimbo
Wales from the US) that has mostly the same and in some aspects already lager
dimensions as Microsoft Encarta or Encyclopaedia Britannica and has gained
larger media interest in the recent past. Wikipedia has at the moment more
than one million articles in all languages (only German pages already more
than 150'000, there also exists a large french subproject at
http://fr.wikipedia.org ) and belongs to the top 500 of visited internet
pages according to independent analysis.
Wikipedia is the (already successful) attempt to port the idea of free
software (for example the famous Linux operating system, which is also used
in many places by ESA) to literature.
So would it be possible to release the ESA images within the Public Domain or
the GNU-FDL? ESA would for sure win with this step.
However your answer is, we will respect your copyright (and act according to
our principles).
Best regards,
Daniel Arnold
-a free willy Wikipedia contributor