[Mediawiki-l] Category links
Rick DeNatale
rick.denatale at gmail.com
Fri Apr 7 19:43:27 UTC 2006
On 4/7/06, John Wiedenhoeft <wiedenhoeft at gmx.net> wrote:
> Stupid question: if you have to categorize a category as a subcategory
> of another category, there will always be at least one category that's
> still red, unless you build up circles?
> >
> > 4) The red category link is an indication that either:
> > a) This is a newish category which hasn't yet been categorized itself
> > or
> > b) The category name was mistyped.
Well, it IS a bit metaphysical.
To get a sense of how it works on wikipedia look at:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Fundamental
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category_talk:Fundamental
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Categories
Which I think should be the only uncategorized category, which is why,
in turn I believe is the motivation for the special page:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Uncategorizedcategories
Which I think is there to look for problem categories, and which
doesn't seem to be real time.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category_talk:Categories
--
Rick DeNatale
Visit the Project Mercury Wiki Site
http://www.mercuryspacecraft.com/
More information about the MediaWiki-l
mailing list