On 11/30/05, Rowan Collins <rowan.collins(a)gmail.com> wrote:
OK, no need for accusations
Sorry to snap at you, and thanks for correcting the errors, pedanticly or
not.
That's what I get for writing to maling lists when I really should be
sleeping. :)
Part of your confusion is that I meant both things, probably because I'm
confused about what I want. It's been a while since I set up the wiki,
so weak memory on this stuff does not help.
I *thought* you were talking about pages which were literally *part
of* the interface;
I'm not sure that this isn't the case. As another poster pointed out,
there are pages that need to be site appropriate. I think I've listed most
of them in my posting to the list, but I'm sure I missed a few.
The key here is prioritizing what needs changing -- things that are critical
to a site's layout and purpose, vs. all messages in the system.
But most of the pages that bother me I think are linked to from the system
messages, which is why they got missed.