[Licom-l] Launch: still 2 April?

Thu Apr 2 01:09:02 UTC 2009

Do we have to finish all migration by August 1, 2009? Or as long as we obtained community consensus before August then we can safely migrate even when we past that day without much of an issue?

Andrew

"Fill the world with children who care and things start looking up."

> Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 03:05:33 +0200
> From: erik at wikimedia.org
> To: licom-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Subject: Re: [Licom-l] Launch: still 2 April?
> 
> 2009/4/2 Casey Brown <cbrown1023.ml at gmail.com>:
> >> and I know Tim is making active progress on the software, so hopefully
> >> everything will align quickly.
> >>
> >
> > I think this is what we should wait for primarily, and Erik's okay. :-)
> 
> I've asked Brion/Tim for an update on the deployment front, but my
> sense is that we may have to delay until April 7-ish to make sure the
> system is properly tested and a good baseline of translations is in
> place. I'll post a final update on this tomorrow.
> 
> Ryan makes a good point with regard to the license template situation,
> which is separate from the voting process. Ryan, can you perhaps start
> collecting some of the information - which templates need to be
> updated, etc. - on a Meta page, and we can try to rally folks to
> contribute missing info?
> 
> Thanks,
> Erik
> -- 
> Erik Möller
> Deputy Director, Wikimedia Foundation
> 
> Support Free Knowledge: http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Donate
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Licom-l mailing list
> Licom-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/licom-l

_________________________________________________________________
Experience all of the new features, and Reconnect with your life.
http://go.microsoft.com/?linkid=9650730
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/licom-l/attachments/20090401/96f9bd08/attachment.htm 