[Foundation-l] Meta:MetaProject to Overhaul Meta

Thu Mar 30 05:37:16 UTC 2006

I have been  claiming the page which contains the obscene word
mentioned should be deleted because of its obscenity and making
editors who are really working on there displeased.

Others, most of them were from en.wikipedia opposed strongly.

And now, that word which I can't utter without harming my own dignity
and decency appears by thank of an editor  whose edits on meta I don't
know.

In addition, on RfD on meta, two unexperienced users obsessively claim
certain pages which are *very useful* for me as a translation
coordinator should be deleted because they can't understand their
relevance to meta activity, coordination between projects.

I am fed up with those absurdity.

Anthere said the issues on meta had nothing to the Foundation. If so,
is it also unappropriate for me to oppose those requested deletions on
the behalf of communication committee whose subcommittee I belong to?

I feel myself being mimed by those "overhaul" folks. They want to
deprive my tools from me. I can't imagine in this circumstance what I
can for coordination.

Aph.

On 3/30/06, Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 3/29/06, David Gerard <dgerard at gmail.com> wrote:
> [snip]
> > That's nice. Are you speaking for the Foundation here? I ask because
> > of opinions expressed by Aurevilly and Delphine on the Communications
> > Committee list regarding en: Wikipedia. Fairly problematic ones
> > considering Wikimedia France is the one local chapter that is actually
> > legally affiliated with the Foundation. I note that Aurevilly just
> > blanked his en: Wikipedia user page, coinciding with expressing his
> > contempt for en:wp openly. Just the thing for a Foundation person to
> > show their high regard for cross project issues.
> >

> > What on earth is going in in WMF France? Has en: wikipedia been
> > declared the enemy?
>
> Bringing this back on the topic of the meta cleanup,  this post/thread
> is obvious evidence that http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Dick is still
> needed and important and shouldn't be removed.
>
> ;)
>
> Just an observation.
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at wikimedia.org
> http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>

--
Aphaea@*.wikipedia.org
email: Aphaia @ gmail (dot) com