Hi all,
Your input could be valuable – the Annual Plan process is
accepting comments up until May 31, which is coming up soon.
Of interest to WREN folks: this discussion thread about the Commons in the
annual plan:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Wikimedia_Foundation_Annual_Plan/2024-…
The numerous mentions of Wikipedia in the plan, with barely a mention of
Commons or Wikidata, makes it even more important to make GLAM-oriented
projects more visible.
It may be useful to add your perspectives from your GLAM wiki work with
Commons and/or Wikidata. For example:
- Wiki Loves Monuments has been certified as the world's largest
photography contest, but the software to support it is out of date and
needs updating. This has inspired other Wiki Loves projects like Earth and
Folklore.
- The ISA Tool has been successful in engaging participants on mobiles to
contribute to Commons but has needed more technical support, having
months-long outages at a time.
- We have been waiting for better support for color and textured 3D
content, but are at a standstill with file format support issues on Commons.
I've chimed in with some of my thoughts about how some of my GLAM wiki
projects have been waiting for more Commons issues to be addressed. The
momentum seems to be there to get these issues on the map with the
Foundation, so I'd encourage you to chime in if you can.
Thanks!
-Andrew
--
-Andrew Lih
Smithsonian Institution - Wikimedian at Large
Previously: professor of journalism and communications, American
University, Columbia University, University of Southern California
---
Email: andrew.lih(a)gmail.com, andrew(a)andrewlih.com
WEB: https://muckrack.com/fuzheado
PROJECT: Wikipedia Space: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:WPSPACE
There's a lot about the gender gap, in terms of Wikipedia projects,
published research, and initiatives.
What resource (on wiki or not) do you think gives the best overview /
summary / introduction to the gender gap on Wikipedia? What is the best
source you know of, that could give someone a solid orientation on the
issue?
Thanks for all the feedback; it's super helpful, especially when resources
get mentioned that I didn't have on my radar.
Mary Mark Ockerbloom
We need your expertise! Your insights are crucial to the GLAM CSI
(Contributor Study Initiative) project, and we invite you to participate in
our survey today.
https://wikimediafoundation.limesurvey.net/985159?lang=en
Please fill out the GLAM CSI survey in the context of any GLAM-related work
you might have done, as we are attempting to capture user stories for
feedback to the WMF. You could answer it from the viewpoint of a volunteer
editor, a Wikimedian in Residence, an affiliate collaboration, or in the
persona of any existing (or recent) GLAM Wiki effort as well. (GLAM is
considered quite a broad term in this context, so content partnerships in
general are welcome.)
A description and survey can be found here:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/GLAM_CSI#Survey
Let me know if you have any questions or issues. I will be talking about
the project at the upcoming Wikimedia Hackathon in May and at Wikimania in
August.
Thanks!
-Andrew Lih
GLAM CSI, principal investigator
Smithsonian Institution, Wikimedian at Large
Hello all,
What are the best tools and training materials you've found? Are they
up-to-date? What do you recommend?
Several years ago I wrote a Wikipedia Workbook for Vizcaya Museum and
Gardens in Miami, which I am currently updating. The goal is an overview of
the sorts of things that institutions can do with Wikipedia, Wikidata and
Commons, with links to useful starting points for staff such as tools and
training materials. Given that many of the Wiki interfaces and tools have
changed over time, I am looking particularly for suggestions and updates.
For example, many of the Art+Feminism resources are long gone. So what do
you recommend?
Feel free to reply here or email me at celebration.women(a)gmail.com
I am happy to share the new edition of the workbook when it is ready.
-- Mary Mark Ockerbloom
Hello everyone,
A few weeks ago, we announced the WikiLearn course on how to upload and
edit files on Wikimedia Commons using OpenRefine.
- In English: OpenRefine for Wikimedia Commons: the basics
<https://learn.wiki/courses/course-v1:Wikimedia-Foundation+WMF_GLAM001+2023/…>
- In Spanish / Español*: OpenRefine para Wikimedia Commons: conceptos
básicos
<https://learn.wiki/courses/course-v1:Wikimedia-Foundation+WMF_GLAM001+2024_…>
- In French / Français*: OpenRefine pour Wikimedia Commons : les bases
<https://learn.wiki/courses/course-v1:Wikimedia-Foundation+WMF_GLAM001+2024_…>
We are now happy to announce the translation for Italian!
- In Italian / Italiano: Introduzione all'uso di OpenRefine per
Wikimedia Commons
<https://learn.wiki/courses/course-v1:Wikimedia-Foundation+WMF_GLAM001+2024_…>
This course can be easily translated into other languages (more about
the translation process here
<https://studio.learn.wiki/meta_translations/discover_courses/> and here
<https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tutorial_on_how_to_translate_course…>).
More translations are on the way, including Portuguese, which will be
launched soon.
All the versions of this course are available at any time for free. You
only need a Wikimedia account and the course can be followed at your own
pace, with computer-graded exercises. A certificate is awarded at the end
and an average of 6 to 8 hours is needed to complete the course.
Please, feel free to share these translations with people who speak these
languages and who you think might be interested in learning more
about OpenRefine or Wikimedia Commons.
Thank you so much, Marta Erica Arosio, for your amazing work translating
this course into Italian! 👏👏👏
Best,
Giovanna
* These two courses/languages had problems before and are now fixed and
fully available.
Giovanna Fontenelle (she/her)
Program Officer, Culture and Heritage
Wikimedia Foundation <https://wikimediafoundation.org/>
Hi everyone,
It’s time for the fifth edition of the Coolest Tool Award!! 🎉
Tools play an essential role at Wikimedia, and so do the many volunteer
developers who experiment with new ideas, develop & maintain local & global
solutions, and enhance the experience for Wikimedia communities.
We’d like to invite you all to nominate your favourite & most used tools
and help us celebrate the people who create them!
To nominate your favourite tools, simply follow this link:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Coolest_Tool_Award#Coolest_Tool_Award_2024.
Feel free to submit multiple nominations by completing the form as many
times as you'd like. The deadline for Nomination is* May 10th 2024.*
For further details on the nomination and selection process, the Coolest
Tool Award Academy, and the upcoming award ceremony, please visit
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Coolest_Tool_Award.
The award is organized & selected by the Coolest Tool Academy. We plan to
award the coolest tools in a variety of categories (see last year’s
categories for an example). Excitingly, we're returning to an in-person
event for the first time since 2019, with winners set to be unveiled at
Wikimania 2024.
Thank you immensely for your participation and recommendations. Together,
let's celebrate innovation and collaboration within the Wikimedia community!
Regards,
On behalf of the Coolest Tool Academy 2024
Hello everyone,
A few weeks ago, we announced the course on the learning platform,
WikiLearn, on how to upload and edit files on Wikimedia Commons using
OpenRefine: *OpenRefine for Wikimedia Commons: the basics*
<https://learn.wiki/courses/course-v1:Wikimedia-Foundation+WMF_GLAM001+2023/…>
.
Today, we are happy to announce two translations of the course: Spanish and
French!
- OpenRefine para Wikimedia Commons: conceptos básicos
<https://app.learn.wiki/learning/course/course-v1:Wikimedia-Foundation+WMF_G…>
(Spanish
/ Español)
- OpenRefine pour Wikimedia Commons : les bases
<https://app.learn.wiki/learning/course/course-v1:Wikimedia-Foundation+WMF_G…>
(French,
Français)
This course can be easily translated into other languages (more about the
translation process here
<https://studio.learn.wiki/meta_translations/discover_courses/> and here
<https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tutorial_on_how_to_translate_course…>).
More translations, such as Italian, Portuguese, and Basque, are being
worked on.
Just like the English course, the Spanish and French versions are available
at any time, for free. You only need a Wikimedia account and the course can
be followed at your own pace, with computer-graded exercises. A certificate
is awarded at the end and an average of 6 to 8 hours is needed to complete
the course.
Please, feel free to share these translations with people who speak these
languages and who you think might be interested in learning more about
OpenRefine or Wikimedia Commons.
Thanks, Carla Toro and Reda Kherbouche, for their amazing work translating
these courses!
Best,
Giovanna
Giovanna Fontenelle (she/her)
Program Officer, Culture and Heritage
Wikimedia Foundation <https://wikimediafoundation.org/>
FRENCH / FRANÇAIS :
(English below / anglais plus bas)
Bonjour à toutes et tous,
Je m'appelle [ https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utilisateur:Micka%C3%ABl_en_r%C3%A9sidence | Mickaël Schauli ] , et j'ai le plaisir d'être, depuis un mois, Wikimédien en résidence à Strasbourg, dans l'est de la France.
Je suis accueilli par l' [ https://urfist.unistra.fr/ | URFIST ] (Unité régionale de formation à l'information scientifique et technique) de l'Université de Strasbourg.
Ce poste résulte d'un partenariat entre le ministère français de l'enseignement supérieur et de Wikimédia France, dans le cadre d'un plan national pour la science ouverte.
Je resterai au sein de l'Université pendant un an, jusqu'en mars 2025. Pendant ma résidence, je vais notamment m'occuper de former les équipes universitaires en interne, organiser des ateliers et coordonner les projets qui existent déjà.
Plus d'informations (en français) sur [ https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Projet:Wikifier_la_science | cette page ] .
Sentez-vous libre de me poser toutes vos questions. J'aurai sans doute le plaisir de croiser certain·es d'entre vous à la prochaine Wikimania.
En vous souhaitant une très agréable semaine et au plaisir d'échanger avec vous,
Bien à vous,
Mickaël Schauli
Wikimédien en résidence
URFIST de Strasbourg
Bâtiment Le Studium, Bureau E.24
2 rue Blaise Pascal, 67000 Strasbourg
ENGLISH / ANGLAIS :
Hello everyone,
My name is [ https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utilisateur:Micka%C3%ABl_en_r%C3%A9sidence | Mickaël Schauli ] , and a month ago I started a residence in Strasbourg, in Eastern France.
I'm hosted by the [ https://urfist.unistra.fr/ | URFIST ] (Unité régionale de formation à l'information scientifique et technique / Regional training unit for scientific and technical information) at the University of Strasbourg.
This position is the result of a partnership between the French Ministry of Higher Education and Wikimedia France, as part of a national plan for open science.
I'll be staying at the University for a year, until March 2025. During my residence, I'll be training internal university teams, organizing workshops and coordinating existing projects.
More information (in French) on [ https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Projet:Wikifier_la_science | this page ] .
Feel free to ask any questions and I may see some of you at the next Wikimania,
Wishing you a very pleasant week and looking forward to hearing from you,
Kind regards,
Mickaël Schauli
Wikimédian in residence
URFIST de Strasbourg
Bâtiment Le Studium, Bureau E.24
2 rue Blaise Pascal, 67000 Strasbourg
Hello,
On English Wikipedia there are some editors and reviewers accusing a
Wikimedian in Residence of misconduct. I am not asking for any particular
response from anyone, except that Wikimedians in Residence plan to support
members in achieving compliance with rules and defense of
misunderstandings.
The above is the minimum that anyone needs to read. What follows are
details.
---------------------------------------------
My own summary and perspective: Rachel Helps, Wikimedian in Residence at a
university in the United States since 2016, is accused of undisclosed
conflict of interest editing, biased editing, and recruiting paid and
unpaid colleagues in inappropriate editing. In my opinion, this editor has
done everything correctly as the Wikimedians in Residence Exchange Network
recommends. I could be mistaken because the discussion and texts run for
hundreds of pages, but I do not immediately identify particular problems. I
posted in support of this editor in the discussion.
I do not think this accusation is easy to understand. Note also -
Wikipedia prohibits canvassing of uninterested parties to post in existing
discussions and decisions, and I am not asking anyone to casually join this
discussion.
See the discussion at
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incid…
archived at
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noti…
Regardless, WREN needs the following to prevent this in the future -
1. clear guidance on how to be a good Wikimedian in Residence
2. a plan for reacting to accusations, if anyone ever wants an
organizational opinion on whether someone is following the rules
3. confirmation from the wiki community that our recommendations are
actually acceptable to wiki editors
I estimate that the university partner here has spent several hundred
thousand dollars of its own money, without Wikimedia Foundation grant
support, to develop Wikimedia content. Their particular expertise is in an
irreplaceable field of religious studies. I would regret the loss of this
institutional partnership, and our colleague, if there were a way to
negotiate a fix to this rather than an end to the program there.
thanks
--
Lane Rasberry
user:bluerasberry
🟦🌀💙🌀🟦
Hi all,
There are two days left for submissions for Wikimania panels or sessions.
Has anyone submitted or is anyone planning on submitting sessions on their
GLAM work, or might folks be interested in making a WREN panel to discuss
the last year's worth of learnings, and also do some evangelism for WREN?
A very regrettable thing for this year's Wikimania is that the submissions
are not public. That makes it impossible to figure out what other people
are submitting or what they are thinking. So if you have any sessions you
are proposing, do share them here. Or we can combine forces on a session.
Some thoughts:
1. From the Smithsonian side, we will likely submit one about the American
Women's History Initiative and summing up our edit-a-thon and other
activities - what we learned, what techniques have worked, and plans for
the future.
2. GLAM tools and best practices - Incorporating SDC into the workflow,
best tools for 2022? Might this be a session of interest for folks to
collaborate on?
3. We've had a GLAM Culture Crawl day in the past, where we have training
sessions and discussions oriented towards teaching GLAMs new to wiki
contribution. Might this be an interesting thing to propose?
Any other ideas welcome.
-Andrew