hi all,
actually DBnary is an up to date approach. Maybe Gilles can post something about the
current state.
we didn't get funding for the wiktionary extraction and Jonas didn't want to
become my phd student :(
we really hope to create a huge mesh of all open dictionary date, soon.
Sebastian
On 27 November 2014 3:44:34 PM GMT+01:00, Karl Bartel <karl42(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Dimtiris,
it's excellent to hear that someone is still taking care of this
project! It seems to be the most promising extraction approach to
Wiktionary and I was afraid it might have been abandoned completely.
Can you please try this link for editing?
http://wiki.dbpedia.org/Wiktionary/edit
Thanks, that works. I will update it later this week in those places
where I'm confident that my basic but current knowledge is better than
the existing outdated text.
Can you try to run the project from github and
tell me if you run
into
After figuring out how to get everything to run, it mostly worked
well. I have extracted triples from the current English and German
dumps and loaded them into a local fuseki server for some basic
testing. A lot of data is there, but there seem to be at least some
extraction problems. The most obvious thing is that the hasTranslation
triples are not generated. I didn't find the time to understand the
translation helper, yet. So I'm not sure whether that is just a minor
syntax change in the Wiktionary or something is really broken.
Is there anything I should know about the translation extraction? Why
is a helper needed for it, instead of an ordinary template tag with
result triples?
Karl
_______________________________________________
Wiktionary-l mailing list
Wiktionary-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiktionary-l
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.