Philippe, Juan:
2010/8/10 Juan de Vojníkov <juandevojnikov(a)gmail.com>
Well, the number of pages is also a question. Now it
looks like that it is
enough for Foundation to look on the quality and/or vitality of the project.
Well there is not other way how to evaluate it.
But according my opinion it doesnt say nothing about Wikiversity. It is a
good measure of succes for wp (no. of articles), wikt (no. of words), wb
(no. of pages of a textbook). But for wv number of educational resources?
How educational resource is defined? Lets have a look on Bloom Clock, it can
cover 20% of total article count. I.e. there are 6 thousand pages on the
project and 2 thousand are botanical items. So thats why number of pages is
not good enough to evaluate wv.
And well, thanks to Philippe Beaudette "after many core contributors left"
is a better statement.
I don't want to deprive you of a discussion of Wikiveristy vitality. I think
this is the purpose of this mailing list.
However, I would invite either or both of you to start up a new thread on
this, as this thread is supposed to be on the
Sandbox Server. I would gladly participate on such a thread, in fact.
If, of course, you guys want to talk more about the Sandbox server, have
some suggestions or comments, or a question
on this, please hit reply and wax eloquently. :)
Thanks,
Gerald