Guillaume Paumier wrote:
Hello,
Here are some questions that have been asked on Beta FAQ. I have some
ideas but I would like other people to give their opinion (a kind of
brainstorming).
Thanks for your time!
g.
----------------------------------------------------------
What does Wikiversity Beta offer over Meta?
For my own opinion: Nothing. Oh, I guess you can say that by having a
smaller Wiki that you can find common information about Wikiversity, but
that means that you now have yet another website to find historical
information about Wikiversity, in addition to Meta and Wikibooks (in all
languages as well). I feel that the existing Metawiki on
http://meta.wikimedia.org/ does more than enough to deal with all of the
associated issues that have to be done for multi-lingual coordination of
Wikiversity projects. There is also an existing base of
admins/bureaucrats and policies in place to help deal with the content
from vandals and others who would damage such a project. Starting out a
brand new wiki just discussing meta issues of all Wikiversities is not
needed at the moment, if only because there simply isn't the user base
necessary to maintain such a website, especially when other alternatives
already exist that can do as good if not a better job.
Why do we need a Wikiversity Beta instead of using the Wikimedia
Incubator?
This is a general question that I have not seen answered. I suggest
that this is a duplication of what the Wikimedia incubator already is
providing, and proves that the beta website is simply not needed at all,
at least in the capacity of being a proving ground for new language
versions of Wikiversity. Of course the mission and role of the
Wikimedia Incubator is still not completely defined and lacked a
community to help get it going as well. Perhaps this is a sign that
Wikimedia projects are getting so large and diverse that we now have
projects at competing and cross-purposes?
What about Wikiversity projects that are currently on Wikibooks,
including non-English versions of Wikiversity?
I certainly don't think that the pt.wikiversity should be transwikied
from pt.wikibooks to beta.wikiversity right away, just to be moved again
to yet another wiki in the future. There were about a dozen active
Wikiversity projects going on Wikibooks in all languages, and this
represents a significant quantity of content that must be at least
acknowledged in some form or another.
There is (unfortunately) a still-active community of Wikiversity
contributors on Wikibooks. While most of the vocal ones have moved to
en.wikiversity, there are a few minor edits and changes that are still
happening on en.wikibooks. This will end shortly in one form or
another, but it is something that should be acknowledged in some form or
another.
For those individuals who think they can put together a sizable
community to get a Wikiversity project going in a language other than
English or German, I would strongly recommend that they try to submit a
request to Meta at [[meta:Requests for new languages]]. There already
is a major section for Wikiversity, and some lively discussions that are
happening there. Most notably from my perspective is that both
sp.wikiversity and fr.wikiversity ought to be started, or at least there
isn't a legitimate reason to deny starting language editions for either
of these langauges. There certainly are very large communities for both
groups, including very experienced administrators willing to work with
maintaining content in those languages.
What I find most unfortunate is that this wiki (beta.wikiversity) was
set up on the authority of a single e-mail message from Anthere, and no
community discussion as to if it was even needed in the first place.
Indeed I have long argued for at least as long as that e-mail message
from Anthere was sent, that it should not be created. I guess my
contrary arguments never were listened to, and certainly have never been
acknowledged by those who are working on the beta.wikiversity. Of
course trying to find a proper forum to lodge complaints about setting
this website up have been next to impossible to find as well. It is,
for me, more proof that it is a very small group that really has an
influence to establish project like this and that pet projects are
prefered over ones that have strong community support. And that is pet
projects by those in the "inner circle" of the Wikimedia Foundation and
the developer team.
--
Robert Scott Horning