Phil Boswell wrote:
Ilmari Karonen wrote:
Phil Boswell wrote:
[snip]
So when someone is blocked because they are
working through an open
proxy,
do we currently inform them of the admirable "XFF Project"?
Should we?
It might be useful to add a mention to the {{SharedIP}} template. To
make the change effective, we'd also need to have a bot fix all the
substed instances of that template.
This is where I manfully suppress my opinion of the mad rush to SUBSTitute
every damn template on the wiki...
Does anyone recall what the actual point of having templates was?
Oh yes: so we could update stuff in a single place and have it propagate
automatically.
The [[Template:Openproxy]] message that is placed on the IP's user_talk page
is primarily for our own convenience, as it adds that IP to
[[Category:Wikipedia:Blocked_open_proxies]]. We generally use the template
call "{{openproxy}}" as the block summary, like this:
* 09:11, March 18, 2006 Freakofnurture blocked "213.216.199.14 (contribs)"
with an expiry time of indefinite (Tor {{openproxy}})
When somebody attempts to edit from that IP, they are presented with the
[[MediaWiki:Blockedtext]] page, and on this page, the "$2" is replaced by
the block reason, which in this case expands into the _current_ revision of
the {{openproxy}} template. So I don't think we need to run an "unsubsting
bot" anytime soon. Especially whatever is on the user_talk will only be read
by the first user of that IP who sees the orange "new messages" banner on
their screen, and never again.
--freakofnurture
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Tor-and-%22X-Forwarded-For%22-t1325932.html#a3564576
Sent from the Wikipedia Developers forum at
Nabble.com.