There's a few feature requests that have come up
multiple times, and I'd
like some comments from other developers and power users before I go
trashing the code on my own...
* "Most wanted" and "Most popular" special pages list the _total_
number
of links to a page, regardless of how many links there are _per page_.
Some types of lists can hyperinflate the numbers; a list of video games
might link [[Playstation]] 389 times (once for each Playstation game
listed). The behavior that people seem to expect is a count of _pages_
that link, rather than the raw number of links. I would tend to agree.
This can be switched by the simple addition of "DISTINCT" to a couple
SQL queries; is there any reason to retain the current behavior?
Being one of those who requested this (after noticing a page got #8 on 'Most
wanted pages' with 13 links of which 12 were from one page), I am all for it.
* On blocking vandals; there's still no interface
for blocking by
username, and you can't get the IP address of a logged-in user except by
sifting through the server logs. Should we retain and display IP
addresses/hostnames of logged-in editors (as on UseMod), and/or allow
usernames to be blocked?
No opinion
* The administrative page rename feature on UseMod
could optionally find
and change links to point to the new name in addition to just supplying
a redirect. We still haven't implemented this. Desirable?
If so, then only on an optional basis. Sometimes one DOES want to keep the
links to the old page. As a precaution for when one might split the two
subjects again in the future.
For example, in the Dutch Wikipedia I recently moved 'Trebizonde' (English
'Trebizond') to 'Trabzon'. Trabzon is a city in northeast Turkey,
Trebizond(e)
its old name. It has an important place in history, and it might well be that
in the future one would want to have a separate page about the history, or
perhaps about the independent state in the region around the city in the High
Middle Ages. And 'Trebizond(e)' would be a good name for such an article. If
that ever happens, it would be nice to have the links run right already.
One thing that I _would_ like to have, is to automatically change links _from
redirect pages_. Double redirects simply look extremely ugly and
non-informative, and are among the things we should most like to avoid.
* While the "Special:" namespace may be
localized ("Spezial", "Speciel"
etc), the names of special pages are hardwired in English (hence
monstrosities like "Spezial:Recentchanges"). While these are mostly
hidden in the interface by descriptive names, the links, URLs, and most
annoyingly the tooltips on the links all show the raw internal English
name of the function which implements the special page. A table of
equivalencies could be set up, allowing more easily recognizable
localized names to be used. Good idea? Bad idea?
Good idea.
* For the French wiki, the Wikipedia: namespace is
tentatively set up as
"Wikipédia" (with acute accent on the "e"). The parser doesn't
accept
namespaces with non-ASCII chars so this doesn't work, which is a bug I
intend to fix, but additionally one tester asked:
'For the francophone wikipedians without a French keyboard, would it
be possible for the "Wikipedia:*" links to automatically transform
into "Wikipédia:*"? Or, more simply, could the system interpret e/é as
equal in the namespace portion?'
In short, allow aliases for namespaces. Good idea? Bad idea?
No opinion.
Andre Engels