On 4/6/07, Evan Prodromou <evan(a)prodromou.name> wrote:
Which of these
stats should be developed to give accurate information to
the world about what performance is being achieved, in an
apples-to-apples comparison to existing suites? What will give WMF the
most credibility in reporting in the future?
Page views per day, I think.
Better be a bit more granular than that. Article views, edit-related
views, RC views, front-page views, etc. As Yahoo! found out recently,
"page views per day" tends to drop rather noticeably when you Ajax
away some of the unnecessary ones. I would say it's not a very useful
statistic.