On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 12:46 AM, Rob Lanphier
<robla(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
"Unaccept" seems suitably rare that I
think we should consider a
confirmation screen which shows the effect of unaccepting (i.e. a diff
between the latest accepted revision and the penultimate accepted revision).
Does that seem like a reasonable enough failsafe to keep this from being
used unintentionally? This seems beneficial even in the case where the
reviewer knew they were hitting "unaccept".
I had the impression that "unaccept" does not add a new revision to
the page, it simply removes the db entry that the revision in question
was "accepted". Is that wrong?
That's correct, but from the point of view of someone only viewing
accepted versions it will be like a revert.