"Thomas R. Koll" <tomk32(a)gmx.de> writes:
Thanks Thomas, for taking care of my issue. I just decide to join this
mailing list as well - one more list cannot hurt...
But he doesn't want to be a full sysop, don't
know his excact reasons.
He was but gave his rights back a few months ago.
It's me. I neither like the term/title sysop nor admin (resp. the
German translation "Administrator"). I simply don't want to be
responsible, I don't want to defend the WP in court. Etc. pp. Change
the word sysop/admin to something else like "advanced user" and I would
be happy again.
"GreenMountain" <greenmountain(a)alexandria.cc> writes:
Yes, I agree. I think that a sysop should be
responsible.
I don't want to be responsible as a sysop; I want to be responsible for
my own edits only.
On the other hand, I think that individuals who
aren't sysops, might
become, "SIP's" (sysops in training,) and they could edit protected
pages, and could not delete, or block.
I'm not interested in those actions. I'm just interested in SQL.
Maybe the Term/title ("SIP's" (sysops in training)) is good enough; to
be translated as "Anwärter" ;)
--
| ,__o
| _-\_<,
http://www.gnu.franken.de/ke/ | (*)/'(*)