On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 11:41 AM, C. Scott Ananian <cananian(a)wikimedia.org>
wrote:
Think of this like
the traditional [[devil's advocate]] process for canonizing a saint. I'm
just challenging us to take a hard look at our reasoning and make sure it
is well-founded technically.
I for one appreciate your engagement here, even if it has not been
popular.
It is easy for a group to make a snap decision, or to end up in an echo
chamber, where decisions seem "obvious" to everyone who is participating.
Yes, sometimes there are easy or obvious decisions. But with the stakes so
high on this one, it seems prudent to think it through, enumerate the
arguments, and invite discussion.
If the decision is really so clearcut, the analysis and discussion should
be quick and painless. Hopefully it can also be civil and respectful,
especially toward those arguing the minority view (whether because they
believe it, or because they are just trying to help reach the best possible
outcome).
For what it's worth, I have added this topic to the TechCom internal
meeting agenda for this week. They can decide whether or not to schedule an
IRC meeting, or to take other steps.
Kevin