Ivan Krstic wrote:
Brion Vibber wrote:
Please take a look at the parser cache and see if
it's missing any
needed functionality.
What are the current cache hit/miss rates like? I wrote the last post
based on the premise that memcached only makes it possible to cache a
fraction of the article space, still making the parser churn quite a
bit, making people unhappy.
I don't know what our current hit rate looks like, but memcached can be
arbitrarily large since it is spread across many machines. (The
cluster's total memory capacity is something like 40 gb.)
The parser cache iirc does have to parse _differently_ for users with
different options, so I don't know how much duplication there is.
-- brion vibber (brion @
pobox.com)