Jay Ashworth wrote:
The fundamental recurring argument seems to me to be
"we can't do
that; we'll break too much stuff."
The last time this came up (or maybe it was five or ten times
ago; I can't keep track) I think I remember Brion stating pretty
emphatically that no change to the parser could be contemplated if
it broke *any* stuff. And on one level I think I agree: a cavalier
change, that might break stuff and take some time to clean up after,
is a very different prospect on a project with 100 pages, or even
10,000 pages, than it is on one with 2,000,000 pages.