In general I would prefer to keep vulgar language out of the projects, as
it doesn't bring anything positive.
Research shows that swearing causes stress [1], and there are many ways of
showing dissatisfaction without using coarse language.
For instance, I would appreciate if there would be more interest in using
Nonviolent Communication, as it is more effective in getting the message
across than with negativity.
Introduction:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M-129JLTjkQ
Regards,
Micru
[1]
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0022341
On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 5:53 PM BinĂ¡ris <wikiposta(a)gmail.com> wrote:
That's what I called a very first world problem.
This happens when American culture and behavioral standard is extended to
an international community.
It is not rally polite to write that F-thing (how many times has it been
written directly or abbreviated or indirectly in this very discussion?).
But to ban a member of the technical community from the working environment
is really harmful.
Although we do block people from editing Wikipedia, too, but we do it
publicly, clearly, comparably, and by the rules of the local community, not
by hidden rules of admin board. And not for one ugly word.
This secret banning undermines the community, and therefore it is
destructive.
Additionally, as code of conduxt itself was discussed here, the coc file
case was discussed here a few weeks ago, and this is the place where most
Phabricatos users communicate, this is a good place to discuss this case,
too. Publicity is good.
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
--
Etiamsi omnes, ego non