On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 12:49 PM, Faidon Liambotis
<faidon(a)wikimedia.org>wrote;wrote:
My understanding of the process was that we would
collect a broad set of
arguments/ideas/proposals and people would be later assigned to the task
of evaluating them and proposing a viable solution and a migration path
(or not, and propose that we stay with Gerrit).
Yes, we're seeking a broad range of proposals. However, "proposals" is
the
key word. That means looking the requirements, reading the website and
matching against those requirements, and stitching together something that
at least looks good on paper. I'm not expecting anyone to set up a
prototype, but I am asking that, given how long we've been talking about
this, that we narrow down our options a bit to the things that we know are
worth looking at rather than (still, a year later) having the "have you
looked at this?" discussion again.
I think GitLab looks promising but I'm unable to judge it against all of
our requirements just from the online demo and without spending some
amount of time on it. I just put some pros and cons as I see them to the
Wiki page and hope it can be considered.
Regards,
Faidon