On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 2:43 AM, Nikola Smolenski <smolensk(a)eunet.rs> wrote:
* the
timestamp isn't a unique identifier, multiple revisions *might* have the
same timestamp. We need a tiebreak (rev_id would be the obvious choice).
I'd say it is, if sufficiently precise :) If not, either use the
lowest/highest rev_id, or the user could be asked to choose a version.
Seems like a non-issue. User requests the page as it was on the 18th
of december 2006, at 16:45:12 UTC. Which of two (or more versions of
the page) stored within that second is returned is academic, isn't it?
If they know there are two versions and want to refer to a specific
one, they should use a rev_id, not a time.
Steve