2018-08-09 15:12 GMT+03:00 Lucie Kaffee <lucie.kaffee(a)gmail.com>om>:
I understand the wish for a more transparent process.
(What a good thing
there is the possibility to suggest amendments to the CoC!)
But I would like you to consider the following: Someone, who was warned, or
even blocked, might change their behavior. Should we still keep a public
list of all people that ever had contact with the CoC committee? It seems
to me that this could easily be used as a shaming and blaming list. If the
block is over and the person wants to change their behavior, it might be
hard for them to start with a clean sheet if we keep a backlog public of
everyone. I'd see it not only as a privacy issue for the people reporting,
but also the reported.
So basically your're saying that the wiki way of doing things, were
blocks and bans are public and often contain the offending diff, is
bad and should not be followed. Is the CoC committee really the venue
where such a decision should be made? Shouldn't the wiki way be the
default *unless* the community decided otherwise?
Strainu