While what are we arguing then? I think i have lost track.
--
brian
On Wednesday, August 8, 2018, Ryan Kaldari <rkaldari(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
It's possible to highlight abuses while still
being respectful and
collegial. No one is seriously arguing that criticism should be banned (or
the word "fuck").
On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 3:50 PM MZMcBride <z(a)mzmcbride.com> wrote:
> Ori Livneh wrote:
> >MZMcBride has a very good ear for grievances, and he knows how to use
his
considerable social clout to draw attention to them,
and then use words
as a kind of lightning-rod for stoking outrage and focusing it on
particular targets.
I'm going to paraphrase what you're writing here: I spend some of my
accumulated social capital calling out or highlighting abuses by and
corruption within Wikimedia Foundation Inc. And you think that's _bad_?
MZMcBride
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l