On 11/10/07, Jay R. Ashworth <jra(a)baylink.com> wrote:
Not my point. You're discussing speed of cut, I'm discussing *target*
of cut.
Eh? How can good syntax violate the principle of least surprise?
My assertion was that, for analytical purposes, if it
was practical to
run it, we could instrument the parser to log somewhere the count of
constructs it parses on each page, which would save grinding the entire
database to get the statistics of which I speak. The users would grin
it for us.
Sounds good. Transclusion would alter your results, of course.
Steve