To be clear, there are generally no objections to "1) accept FLIF (and possibly
serve PNG thumbs for browsers without js" other than convince commons
it would be a good idea to accept the format. All the controversial
bit is converting files to FLIF. Accepting FLIF files for upload is
non-controversial if the communities want them.
--
Brian
On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Chico Venancio
<chicocvenancio(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I concur with the extension idea.
I'd add that have options for degrees of using FLIF would be a good idea as
well. I.E. the decision could be to simply 1) accept FLIF (and possibly
serve PNG thumbs for browsers without js), to 2) encourage FLIF use, or to
3)"force" FLIF by converting everything to FLIF and serving only FLIF
versions to browsers.
Even option 1 seems unlikely to gather support at this point, but it is a
lot more likely than option 3.
Chico Venancio
2017-12-11 14:22 GMT-03:00 Bartosz Dziewoński <matma.rex(a)gmail.com>om>:
If you want to work on implementing support for
FLIF, I would recommend
doing it as an extension (similar to e.g.
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki
/Extension:PdfHandler) rather than in MediaWiki core.
--
Bartosz Dziewoński
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l