Am Do., 9. Aug. 2018 um 13:50 Uhr schrieb Aryeh Gregor <ayg(a)aryeh.name>me>:
To begin with, punishment of any infraction that
occurred in a
publicly-accessible forum such as Phabricator can be public. If the
infraction itself can remain public, the punishment for it can also.
That seems like a good starting point.
This argument doesn’t work at all, IMHO. Suppose I revealed the real name
of an anonymous contributor in a Phabricator comment (accidentally or as
deliberate doxxing) – just because I thought that this comment could be
public surely doesn’t mean that it should stay public, or that the
subsequent interaction with the CoCC should be public.
Of course, I’m not saying that what happened here was equivalent to doxxing
– I just don’t think it at all follows that the punishment should be public
just because the infraction was.
Cheers,
Lucas
--
Lucas Werkmeister
Software Developer (working student)
Wikimedia Deutschland e. V. | Tempelhofer Ufer 23-24 | 10963 Berlin
Phone: +49 (0)30 219 158 26-0
https://wikimedia.de
Imagine a world, in which every single human being can freely share in the
sum of all knowledge. That‘s our commitment.
Wikimedia Deutschland - Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e. V.
Eingetragen im Vereinsregister des Amtsgerichts Berlin-Charlottenburg unter
der Nummer 23855 B. Als gemeinnützig anerkannt durch das Finanzamt für
Körperschaften I Berlin, Steuernummer 27/029/42207.