On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Brian Gerstle <bgerstle(a)wikimedia.org>
wrote:
IOW, why don't we continue w/ this feature
flagging approach, which seems
like a decent way to version APIs and prevent breaking backwards
compatibility?
That's basically what this is, except it's named "rawcontinue" and
applies
as a boolean to just the continuation format rather than something like
"queryversion".
But we'd still have the issue where changing the default version (or making
the version parameter non-optional) is necessary here, otherwise the
default version would be stuck at "1".
--
Brad Jorsch (Anomie)
Software Engineer
Wikimedia Foundation