Evan Prodromou wrote:
>>>>"AM" == Andr? M?ller <Andr> writes:
AM> The aim of the Wikipedia - in Esperanto I'd call it the "fina
AM> venko" - is to create an encyclopedia or database containing
AM> all the human knowledge.
No, it's not.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not
Encyclopedia != "database containing all human knowledge". An
encyclopedia is an encyclopedia.
Oh, OK. It's an encyclopedia -- so let's take a look at Wiktionary to
find out what an encyclopedia is:
A reference work (often in several volumes) containing in-depth
articles on various topics (often arranged in alphabetical
order) dealing with a wide range of subjects or with some
particular specialty.
This doesn't seem to exclude any human knowledge, neither explicitly nor
implicitly. What parts of human knowledge should in your view not be
covered in an encyclopedia, and why?
Timwi