Mark Williamson napisału:
> I decided to wait a few days before responding to
any of the threads. I've
> read all your comments, and would like to briefly respond.
>
> 1. I am not opposed to Quenya articles in Wikibooks, but how does one even
> go about *that*?
I'm not sure it would be allowed on the English
Wikibooks.
> 2. The Tengwar do not need to be used: Tengwar and
Quenya are independent of
> one another-- Tengwar is simply the type of script, and is not part of the
> language itself. So any objections to Quenya based on problems associated
> with Tengwar are easily solved by using the Roman alphabet, as many Quenya
> speakers already do.
I don't believe there were any actual objections
on the basis of the Tengwar.
> 3. There seem to be two (very opposite!)
objections to Quenya: one that it
> would "never grow large", and the other that it would "take up too
much
> valuable resource space". These two points of view seem quite contrary to
> me. Either it would take up too much space, or it wouldn't ever take up
> "enough" space. I don't see Quenya language on wikipedia growing huge.
> However, I think there is always too much focus on Wikipedia for largesse
> "We're currently working on 455,000 articles!". An encyclopedia
doesn't have
> to have a million articles to *be* an encyclopedia!
There is IMHO not enough official Quenya vocabulary to create an
encyclopedia. A Wiktionary would be OK, but a Wikipedia would have to
use a lot of words made up by the fans - it's a bad idea for me.
--
Ausir
Wikipedia, wolna encyklopedia
http://pl.wikipedia.org