David Monniaux wrote:
The Pokémon articles do not generate angry complaints.
They are used to
mock Wikipedia, but are not a major target for libel and other issues
taking up precious resources.
I generally consider the school articles relatively more important than
the Pokémon articles, though the writing on the latter appears more
thorough. Still I would oppose deleting either. If the school articles
contain libel and other sundry vandalism remove the libel and
vandalism. Stop using that asd an excuse for removing material that you
don't like.
Ec