--- Mark Williamson <node.ue(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> It angers
me very much that you don't take this into
consideration
Mark, woah, come down, unplug the computer and take a walk around
the
building or something.
I don't think Jimbo is siding one way or another. I suggest that
you
contact a chinese linguistics professor at some
fancy university
and
get his expert advice. I know Jimbo listens to
the voice of
reason,
and getting all emotional is not the path.
As I noted in my previous e-mail, both myself and Stirling Newberry
have quoted experts, and I have suggested reading materials.
Obviously not expert enough. Ask the Chinese embassy for an official
statement.
I also think
that there has not been a hard and fast rule made.
Thigs
are still in discovery mode.
It's not the decision that irritates me, it's the reasoning and
what
appears, at least to me, to be ignorance.
Get off your high horse and pony up half a million dollars and 5000
man hours for wikipedia and then we'll talk about ignorance.
Chinese wikipedia will sort itself out. Like they say: "Under the
Manchus for 500 years, can wait 10 more."
=====
Chris Mahan
818.943.1850 cell
chris_mahan(a)yahoo.com
chris.mahan(a)gmail.com
http://www.christophermahan.com/
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
All your favorites on one personal page � Try My Yahoo!
http://my.yahoo.com